Saudi Female EFL University Students’ Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Tools to Improve Reading Fluency and Digital Literacy: ChatGPT as an Example
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Al Asmari, A. (2013). Practices and prospects of Learner Autonomy: Teachers’ perceptions. English Language Teaching, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n3p1
Abdelhalim, S. M. (2024). Critical digital literacy and the dynamics of English language learning practices: Saudi perspectives. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature® – The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 30(4), 276–289. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2024-3004-21
Aldowsari, B. I., & Aljebreen, S. G. (2024). The impact of using a CHATGPT-based application to enhance Saudi students’ EFL vocabulary learning. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies, 6(4), 380–397. https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v6i4.1955
Ali, J. K., Shamsan, M. A., Hezam, T. A., & Mohammed, A. A. (2023). Impact of CHATGPT on learning motivation: Journal of English Studies in Arabia Felix, 2(1), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.56540/jesaf.v2i1.51
Al-Otaibi, M., & Al-Homidhi, K. M. (2025). Teaching program based on ChatGPT and its effectiveness in developing reading comprehension skills for English language students at University. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies, 7(1), 137–154. https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v7i1.1972
Al-Othman, A. A.-A. (2023). Assistive technology for enhancing Saudi female undergraduate students’ reading cognitive abilities: An investigation of reading models and their impacts on reading performance. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 15(1), 116–127. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1501.14
AL-Qahtani, A. A. (2016). Why do Saudi EFL readers exhibit poor reading abilities? English Language and Literature Studies, 6(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.5539/ells.v6n1p1
Alsaif, O. (2024). The role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in developing English language skills in the Saudi EFL context: An analytical study. International Journal of Educational Sciences and Arts, 3(5), 10–21. https://doi.org/10.59992/ijesa.2024.v3n5p1
Alves, L. M., Dias, R. T., Lara, J. B., Santos, L. F., Celeste, L. C., & Martins-Reis, V. de. (2021). Scale of perception and analysis of reading fluency – SOLAR: Usability and consistency. Revista CEFAC, 23(6). https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0216/20212369821
Aydin Yildiz, T. (2023). The impact of CHATGPT on Language learners’ motivation. Journal of Teacher Education and Lifelong Learning, 5(2), 582–597. https://doi.org/10.51535/tell.1314355
Bédi, B., Chiera, B., Chua, C., & Cucchiarini, C. (2023, July). (PDF) CHATGPT-Based Learning and Reading Assistant: Initial Report. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/372526096_ChatGPT-Based_Learning_And_Reading_Assistant_Initial_Report
Çelik, F., Yangın Ersanlı, C., & Arslanbay, G. (2024). Does AI simplification of authentic blog texts improve reading comprehension, inferencing, and anxiety? A one-shot intervention in Turkish EFL context. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 25(3), 287–303. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v25i3.7779
Daweli, T. W., & Mahyoub, R. A. M. (2024). Exploring EFL learners’ perspectives on using AI tools and their impacts in reading instruction: An exploratory study. Arab World English Journal, Special Issue on CALL, 10, 160–171. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/call10.11
Eid Alroqi, A. N. (2024). Effectiveness of communicative language teaching in Non-Urban Areas’ primary schools: The case of Afif, Saudi Arabia. Arab World English Journal, (317), 1–52. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/th.317
El Hassan, F. A., & Alsalwah, A. F. (2025). Exploring the impact of ChatGPT on EFL reading practices: Opportunities and challenges. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 13(1), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.37745/ijelt.13/vol13n18593
Hidayat, M. T. (2024). Effectiveness of AI-based personalised reading platforms in enhancing reading comprehension. Journal of Learning for Development, 11(1), 115–125. https://doi.org/10.56059/jl4d.v11i1.955
Juanda, & Afandi, I. (2024). Assessing text comprehension proficiency: Indonesian higher education students VS CHATGPT. XLinguae, 17(1), 49–68. https://doi.org/10.18355/xl.2024.17.01.04
Kim, R. (2024). Effects of ChatGPT on Korean EFL Learners’ Main-Idea Reading Comprehension via Top-Down Processing. Language Research, 60(1), 83–106. https://doi.org/10.30961/lr.2024.60.1.83
Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. Longman.
Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B. L., & Zou, D. (2023). ChatGPT for language teaching and learning. RELC Journal, 54(2), 537–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231162868
Lee, Y.-J., Davis, R. O., & Lee, S. O. (2024). University students’ perceptions of artificial intelligence-based tools for English writing courses. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/14195
Marzuki, Widiati, U., Rusdin, D., Darwin, & Indrawati, I. (2023). The impact of AI writing tools on the content and organization of students’ writing: EFL teachers’ perspective. Cogent Education, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2023.2236469
Mutammimah, H., Rejeki, S., Kustini, S., & Amelia, R. (2024). Understanding teachers’ perspective toward CHATGPT acceptance in English language teaching. International Journal of Technology in Education, 7(2), 290–307. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.656
Nguyen, T. Q. (2024). Unraveling the potential of ChatGPT: Investigating the efficacy of reading text adaptation. Proceedings of the AsiaCALL International Conference, 4, 159–169. https://doi.org/10.54855/paic.23412
Nguyen, T. T. N. (2023). Exploring Vietnamese EFL students’ perceptions of literature courses in the English Studies Program. International Journal of Language Instruction, 2(3), 80–96. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijli.23234
Ramadhani, R., Aulawi, H., & Ulfa, R. L. (2023). Readability of reading texts as authentic materials issued by CHATGPT: A systemic functional perspective. IJELTAL (Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics), 8(2), 149. https://doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v8i2.1546
Sasikala, P., & Ravichandran, R. (2024). Study on the impact of artificial intelligence on student learning outcomes. Journal of Digital Learning and Education, 4(2), 145–155. https://doi.org/10.52562/jdle.v4i2.1234
Shoufan, A. (2023). Exploring students’ perceptions of CHATGPT: Thematic analysis and follow-up survey. IEEE Access, 11, 38805–38818. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2023.3268224
Song, C., & Song, Y. (2023). Enhancing academic writing skills and motivation: Assessing the efficacy of CHATGPT in AI-Assisted Language Learning for EFL Students. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1260843
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Harvard University Press.
White, G. (2020). Adaptive learning technology relationship with student learning outcomes. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 19, 113–130. https://doi.org/10.28945/4526
Włosowicz, T. M. (2016). Adult learners’ expectations concerning foreign language teachers and the teaching-learning process. Second Language Learning and Teaching, 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32954-3_15
Xiao, C., Xu, S. X., Zhang, K., Wang, Y., & Xia, L. (2023). Evaluating reading comprehension exercises generated by LLMS: A showcase of ChatGPT in education applications. Proceedings of the 18th Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications (BEA 2023). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.bea-1.52
Zheng, S. (2024). The effects of chatbot use on foreign language reading anxiety and reading performance among Chinese secondary school students. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100271
Zhu, G., Fan, X., Hou, C., Zhong, T., Seow, P., Chen, A., Rajalingam, P., Yew, L. K., & Poh, T. L. (2023). Embrace opportunities and face challenges: Using ChatGPT in undergraduate students’ collaborative interdisciplinary learning. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.18616
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.13n.3p.14
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
2013-2025 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.
International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies
You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.